Southern Rust of Corn in Wisconsin

/in , , , /by

Damon Smith, Extension Field Crops Pathologist, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Figure 1. Southern rust on corn. Photo Credit: Emmanuel Byamukama, South Dakota State University, Bugwood.org

If you are like me, you have been paying attention to reports from the southern and other Midwest states indicating that southern rust of corn is making its way further north this year, a first in a couple of years. We have been watching and have indeed confirmed southern rust on field corn in Columbia County Wisconsin this week. You can follow current southern rust updates on the iPiPE site. Now that southern rust has been confirmed in Wisconsin, it is time to NOT PANIC. We just need to be diligent in scouting over the next several weeks so that we can make, first, silage harvest decisions, then grain harvest decisions. Grain yield reductions are greatest if southern rust moves in prior to the “milk” (R3) growth stage in corn. Much of the crop in Wisconsin is nearly past this, so the good news is that impacts on grain yield should not be significant. However, there could be impacts on silage corn harvest as southern rust, like other foliar diseases, can dry the crop prematurely. See my previous article on how silage corn might be impacted by foliar disease. I also would like folks to know which fields southern rust has been a problem this year for grain corn, and prioritize those fields for harvest first, as standability might be an issue in some of these fields.

Southern rust is caused by the fungus Puccinia polysora. Symptoms of southern rust are different from common rust in that they are typically smaller in size and are often a brighter reddish/orange color (Fig. 1). Pustules of southern rust also typically only develop on the upper surface and will be be more densely clustered. Favorable conditions for southern rust development include high humidity and temperatures around 80F. However, very little free moisture is needed for infection to occur. Southern rust is typically a rare occurrence in Wisconsin. When it does occur, it is usually in the southern and south-western portions of the state, with epidemics initiating late in the season. With that said, southern rust has made it to south-central Wisconsin this year. Spores of this fungus have to be blown up from tropical regions or from symptomatic fields in the southern U.S. The fungus can not overwinter in Wisconsin. While southern rust epidemics can be rare events in Wisconsin, the disease can be serious when it occurs prior to the R3 growth stage. Therefore close monitoring of forecasts and scouting are needed to make timely in-season management decisions.

Management of Southern Rust

Traditionally resistance was used to manage southern rust. However, in 2008 a resistance-breaking race of the southern rust fungus was confirmed in Georgia. Thus, most modern hybrids are considered susceptible to southern rust. Rotation and residue management have no effect on the occurrence of southern rust. The southern rust fungus has to have living corn tissue in order to survive and can not overwinter in Wisconsin. Fungicides are typically used to control southern rust in parts of the U.S. where this is a consistent problem. Efficacy ratings are available for fungicides against southern rust on the Corn Fungicide Efficacy Table. As I said previously, should southern rust make its way to Wisconsin prior to the “milk” (R3) growth stage in corn, it could cause yield reductions. A helpful matrix can be found here to help make the fungicide application decision, in order to limit impacts by the southern rust fungus. If you need assistance in identifying rust on corn, leaf samples of corn plants can be sent in a sealed plastic bag with NO added moisture to the University of Wisconsin Plant Disease Diagnostic Clinic (PDDC). Information about the clinic and how to send samples can be found by CLICKING HERE.

 

Figure 2. Common rust on Corn. Photo Credit: Daren Mueller, Iowa State University, Bugwood.org

Common rust is caused by the fungus Puccinia sorghi and is extremely common in Wisconsin, but often results in little yield loss. Most field corn hybrids planted in Wisconsin are very resistant to the disease. Symptoms can include chlorotic flecks that eventually rise and break through the epidermis to produce pustules of brick-red spores (Fig. 2). Typically these pustules are sparsely clustered on the leaf. They can also appear on other parts of the plant including the husks and stalks. Management for common rust primarily focuses on using resistant hybrids. Remember resistance is not immunity, so some pustule development can be observed even on the most resistant hybrids. Some inbred corn lines and specialty corn can be highly susceptible to common rust. Under these circumstances a fungicide may be necessary to control common rust. Most of the hybrids I have scouted this season have some pustules, however incidence and severity is relatively low. Therefore, a fungicide application to control common rust wasn’t needed to manage common rust for most of these hybrids in Wisconsin.

Other Useful Resources about Rusts on Corn

WisCONTEXT Article on Southern Rust

Ohio State University Article on How to Differentiate Common Rust from Southern Rust

Video by Dr. Tamra Jackson-Ziems of the University of Nebraska – Identifying Rust Diseases of Corn

References

Munkvold, G.P. and White, D.G., editors. 2016. Compendium of Corn Diseases, Fourth Edition. APS Press.

Wise, K., Mueller, D., Sisson, A., Smith, D., Bradley, and Robertson, A., editors. 2016. A Farmer’s Guide to Corn Diseases. APS Press.

Disease and Mycotoxin Considerations for Corn Silage Harvest In Wisconsin

/in , , , , , , , , /by

Damon Smith, Extension Field Crops Pathologist, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison

We are quickly approaching that time of year where we will see silage choppers working the 2024 corn crop. This means it is time to understand overall crop health and how diseases might be affecting the crop so that you can make the best silage product you can.

Overall, the corn crop in Wisconsin looks good. Yes, I can find some sort of disease in any field I visit, but I would say for the most part, most fields that were planted relatively on time, and didn’t experience early-season flooding, have a decent crop. With that said, we need to monitor the crop closely as we approach harvest as foliar disease issues can sneak up quickly as cool, wetter weather moves in near the early fall harvest.

Foliar diseases such as southern rust, tar spot, gray leaf spot (GLS), and northern corn leaf blight (NCLB) can be problematic for silage production. Not only do these diseases lead to a reduction in overall silage quality, they can force the plant to scavenge carbohydrates in the stalk which can result in standability issues and lodging. These diseases can also influence whole plant moisture making harvesting at optimal moisture difficult. If silage is harvested at sub-optimal moisture, then packing the bunker properly can be a challenge which can lead to slow fermentation and continued growth of aerobic organisms like fungi. This can indirectly lead to an increase in mycotoxins and “mold” issues from these aerobic fungi.

Tar spot and silage harvest

Tar spot of corn has been an issue on silage corn in Wisconsin since 2016. In fact, the first finding of tar spot was on corn for silage that year. Since 2016 the largest and most consistent impacts happen on corn for silage vs. corn for grain. Yes, tar spot can result in significant grain losses, but tar spot can also affect the overall plant in other ways such as loss in dry-matter yield (Fig. 1) and whole plant moisture contents well below optimal, making bunker-packing a significant issue. In recent work in Wisconsin, we see significant dry-matter yield reductions when tar spot severity on the ear leaf reaches over 10% at the time of chopping. This can result in as much as 15% reduction in yield, with these impacts dramatically increasing at severity levels of 20% or more on the ear leaf (Fig. 1). If tar spot (or any foliar disease) is moving quickly in your silage crop, you might consider chopping a bit earlier to reduce dry-matter yield losses and to try to optimize whole plant moisture, prioritizing good bunker management. If moisture at chopping is not prioritized, then subsequent storage issues such as mold and mycotoxin concerns can arise indirectly, due to poor bunker management. This brings us to Gibberella ear and stalk rot in silage corn.

Figure 1. Impact of tar spot severity on the ear leaf at harvest time compared to dry-matter yield in whole-plant chopped silage corn.

Gibberella and silage harvest

Gibberella ear rot is caused by Fusarium graminearum (a.k.a. Gibberella zea). The same pathogen can cause Gibberella crown and stalk rot in corn. We have observed both diseases on silage corn in Wisconsin in recent years. Our environment here in the Great Lakes region makes a perfect place for this pathogen to cause these diseases. In addition to the damage that the pathogen can cause, the fungus can also produce various mycotoxins, most importantly deoxynivalenol (DON or Vomitoxin). Our laboratory has conducted quite a bit of research recently trying to understand where in the plant DON accumulates. In detached plant part experiments, we have noted that DON can accumulate in both the stalk and ear portions of the plant, AND that these two phases of accumulation are not linked to each other (Chibuogwu et al., 2024). The fungus can infect these parts separately at different times during the season and the subsequent accumulation of DON can happen differentially in the stalks vs. the ears. This is partially why you can go out to the field and scout for ear rot and not see a lot of infection (moldy ears), but still have high DON levels at chopping time. Some of that DON is likely accumulating in the stalks.

We have also been following the fate of DON in silage harvested and chopped from a brown midrib (BMR) hybrid and a dual-purpose hybrid that were grown in the field and treated with fungicides at white silk (R1). We chopped the plants in each plot and then used mini-silos (polyethylene bags vacuum-sealed using a commercial grade vacuum packer) to conduct a time-course experiment following DON levels in the mini-silos (Chibuogwu et al. 2025). In all cases we saw DON levels generally increasing in the first 30 days after chopping (Fig. 2). They then leveled off and became stable at 60, 90, and 120 days after chopping. Some of this increase could be due to oxygen still in the system during the first 30 days after chopping. DON-producing fungi are aerobic and continue to consume some of the minute levels of oxygen still in the system, thereby still producing DON. However, this likely only explains some of the DON levels we detected.

Figure 2. DON concentration of chopped field-grown silage corn over time of ensiling.

There are also “masked” or conjugated forms of DON that are detectable in routine DON analyses. One such conjugate is DON-3-glucoside (D3G). D3G can be produced by fungi or during a plant’s attempt to protect itself from the toxicity of DON. Either way, D3G is not detectable in routine test and must be tested for specifically. We investigated our samples further during the first 30 days of ensiling and found that the level of D3G at harvest, explained a significant level of the DON recorded in samples after 30 days of ensiling. This is to say that D3G present at harvest, is likely metabolized in the first 30 days of ensiling releasing DON and resulting in higher DON levels 30-days later (Fig 3). Again, this relationship only partially explains why DON increases in silage during the first 30 days of storage. The full explanation is likely due to both metabolization of D3G and continued fungal respiration leading to an increase in DON at feed out compared to when it was packed in the bunker.

Figure 3. Relationship of DON-3-Glucoside (log) at harvest and DON concentration after 30 days of ensiling.

The Take Home

So, what are we to do with all of this information? Well, knowledge is power. You need to balance foliar disease management with Gibberella/DON management when making high-quality silage in Wisconsin. Diseases like tar spot are the new normal. As you prepare to harvest, it is a good idea to get out in the field and see how bad the foliar disease is and how much ear rot you are seeing. You will want to prioritize harvest on fields showing more disease. In fields where there are high levels of tar spot, southern rust, or NCLB, monitor moisture carefully and try to chop to optimize moisture. Concentrate on good bunker hygiene and spend time packing the material as best you can, focusing on getting as much oxygen out of the system as you can. If a corn crop becomes too dry to make good silage, you might consider harvesting it for high-moisture grain to try to circumvent bigger issues that could arise at feed out, by making less than ideal silage. Finally, it is important to test for DON frequently and understand what you are dealing with. You want to start with the lowest levels of DON coming from the field that you can. DON will likely increase in the bunker no matter how well you pack it. Thus, starting with the lowest levels at harvest will help keep final levels of DON below critical thresholds. Moving forward, mycotoxin testing in corn should include not only DON but also for conjugates of DON that can be metabolized back to DON and increase the final DON concentration during ensiling.

Have a safe and productive silage harvest season!

Citations

Chibuogwu, M.O., Groves, C.L., Mueller, B., and Smith, D.L. 2024. Effects of fungicide application and corn hybrid class on the presence of Fusarium graminearum and the concentration of deoxynivalenol in ear and stalk parts of corn (Zea mays) used for silage. Plant Disease. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-23-2662-RE.

Chibuogwu, M.O., Reed, H., Groves, C.L., Mueller, B., Barrett-Wilt, G., Webster, R.W., Goeser, J., and Smith, D.L. 2025. Influence of hybrid class and ensiling duration on deoxynivalenol accumulation and its derivative deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside while ensiling corn for silage. Plant Disease. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-24-1166-RE.

Wisconsin Field Crop Disease Update – August 10, 2024

/in , , , , , , /by

Damon Smith, Extension Field Crops Pathologist, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Tar Spot of Corn

Figure 1. Statewide tar spot risk as calculated by the Field Prophet tool for August 10, 2024.

You can find the most recent updates on tar spot confirmations across the U.S. here: https://corn.ipmpipe.org/tarspot/. The Field Prophet tool is also showing mostly moderate risk across the southern two-thirds of Wisconsin, with just the northern tier with high risk for tar spot development at this point in the season (Fig. 1). This means that the weather is less conducive for tar spot development and spread. We are also quickly approaching the end of the in-season management window for applying fungicides in corn for tar spot control. For the major foliar diseases of corn, including tar spot, the optimal window to apply fungicides and maximize return on investment, is between the VT/R1 and R3 growth stages. If your crop has reached the milk growth stage and you are still not seeing any disease and the Tarspotter risk isn’t high, you can hold off on the fungicide application. The likelihood of a yield-limiting tar spot epidemic is low in this situation. You can learn more about fungicide application for tar spot control here.

White Mold of Soybeans

Figure 2. Statewide white mold risk as calculated by the Field Prophet tool for August 10, 2024.

The risk for white mold according to Field Prophet is a bit higher compared to tar spot. Risk is generally high across the state with several pockets of low or medium risk. This means that weather has been conducive for the development of the mushroom-like structure (apothecia) of the white mold fungus that gives rise to spores that infect soybean. These risk estimates appear to be accurate as we continue to find apothecia in fields with a history of white mold (Figure 3). With that said, the soybean crop is quickly approaching the R4 growth stage or beyond, where the opportunity of infection by the white mold fungus does not exist. Thus, there is not a need to spray for white mold beyond the R4 growth stage. Similar to tar spot, the optimal timing of fungicide application ranges from the R1 growth stage to the R3 growth stage in soybeans. If you no longer see flowers on soybeans, then the risk for infection by the white mold fungus is low, despite conducive weather for the fungus.

Use Predictive Tools like a “Crystal Ball”

We continue to get questions about how the apps (Tarspotter, Sporecaster, and Field Prophet) should be used to make decisions about in-season disease management. We have designed these tools to be predictive. This means that the risk indexes you see are telling you that in the next week or two, you might see these diseases pop up. We developed these tools to act like a “crystal ball” so that you can look ahead and apply fungicides in a preventative manner. We know that fungicides work best when applied preventatively. In addition for diseases like tar spot, the fungus that causes this disease has a very long incubation period (time from infection to when you actually see tar spots). This time period can be as long as 30 days. So a high risk today, might indicate seeing tar spot show up even a month from now. Be sure to use these tools to look into the future and to prepare yourself, rather than being reactionary.

Figure 3. Apothecia of the white mold fungus at the base of a soybean stem.

Other Diseases to Watch

Figure 4: Northern corn leaf blight (NCLB) lesion on a corn leaf.

We are starting to find more and more northern corn leaf blight (NCLB; Figure 4) in some fields in Wisconsin. This makes sense as the weather recently has been cooler and wetter. Luckily most of the fungicides used for tar spot also have good efficacy against NCLB. Thus if you sprayed for tar spot, you have probably controlled NCLB too. For those with silage corn, especially brown mid-rib (BMR) hybrids, continue to scout your fields for NCLB. Some BMR hybrids are very susceptible to this disease. If NCLB begins to move quickly and you are approaching your harvest window, you might consider chopping a bit earlier in order to reduce damage by NCLB.

We also continue to watch the frogeye leaf spot situation in soybeans. Our beta-testing models for frogeye leaf spot have shown relatively low risk for this disease in Wisconsin this season. We also have not found any frogeye leaf spot to date. However, the risk is creeping up in southern Wisconsin. The window to treat for this disease ends around R5. Thus, I believe most of the soybeans in Wisconsin will escape frogeye leaf spot without the need to apply a fungicide this season. However, keep an eye on your fields and continue to scout to stay informed of the situation.

Mid-Season Corn and Soybean Disease Update and New Corn Fungicide ROI Calculator

/in , , , , , , , /by

Damon Smith, Extension Field Crops Pathologist, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Tar Spot and Corn

Figure 1. Statewide tar spot risk as calculated by the Field Prophet tool for July 22, 2024.

You can find the most recent updates on tar spot confirmations across the U.S. here: https://corn.ipmpipe.org/tarspot/. The Field Prophet tool is also showing mostly moderate to high risk across the state of Wisconsin (Fig. 1). This means that if your crop is between VT/R1 and R3 you should be actively scouting for tar spot and making the decision to apply a fungicide at this time. Our research has shown that one well-timed application of fungicide somewhere between VT/R1 – R3 will control tar spot enough for a yield response even in a heavy-pressure year. You can learn more about managing tar spot BY CLICKING HERE. If you think you found tar spot I would appreciate if you would let us know. We can enter the county level data into the Corn IPMPipe Map and contribute to the cause.

Gray Leaf Spot and Corn

We are also watching the gray leaf spot (GLS) situation closely. The southern and southwestern portions of the state have had enough heat and moisture that risk is likely high for this disease in those locations. For the rest of the state, risk isn’t as high, but likely moderate risk exists. Fortunately, the same fungicides that work well in controlling tar spot, also work well against GLS. Thus, another reason that a fungicide application may need to be considered at this point in the season.

Corn Fungicide ROI Calculator

With the tight margins in the corn market, and a high risk for disease due to wet weather, I have been getting a lot of questions about fungicide return on investment (ROI) this season. Fortunately, the scientists involved in the Crop Protection Network have been working on amassing fungicide performance and ROI data over the last few seasons and have launched a new interactive Fungicide ROI tool. The tool is research-based using data from across the entire U.S. corn production belt, including Wisconsin. During the studies included in this dataset, the diseases of interest were tar spot and also southern rust. Both are again diseases of interest this season. The tool can be used to run various scenarios that fit your farm and situation in the 2024 growing season. You can change the expected end-of-season disease severity levels, and the pricing of products included in the tool. Not all products labeled for corn can be found there, but most of the popular ones are included. You can also adjust the sale price for your crop, and expected farm yield, so that you can get real estimates of ROI and probability of breaking even for your situation. An example scenario can be found in figure 2 where I adjusted the tool to 180 bu/a yield and a corn sale price of $4 per bushel with expected high levels of tar spot or southern rust. You can see that several products result in a positive net benefit per acre using default product pricing. However, the tight margins this year, do result in lower breakeven probabilities. I would suggest running the tool for your situation. Be honest with yourself and put real numbers in the tool. This tool may be helpful for you if you are on the fence about spraying a fungicide this year. If you have a known resistant hybrid, your crop is already through to R3, and no disease has shown up yet, you might be able to help your financial situation by not spraying this season.

White Mold and Soybeans

Figure 3. Statewide white mold risk as calculated by the Field Prophet tool for July 22, 2024.

The risk for white mold according to Field Prophet is a bit spottier compared to tar spot. Mostly the northern and central portions of the state are at high risk with some pockets of moderate risk. The southeastern portion of Wisconsin is at low risk currently (Fig. 3). This is due to hotter temperatures several weeks back. Regardless of location, our models are telling us that the risk for white mold will continue to rise across the state over the next 7 to 10 days. If you are in a low-risk area and you are at R3 or beyond, you might not have much to worry about for this year when it comes to white mold. However, if you are in a moderate-risk zone, watch this situation carefully. If you are at R3 and the crop has good canopy, you might consider one late R3 application. If you are in a high-risk zone, the crop has canopied, and your soybean crop is in the bloom period, it is time to think about a fungicide application. These will be the areas I would expect to find white mold 1-3 weeks from now. If you would like to learn more about white mold management, check out my previous article HERE.

As always, get out and look at the crop. Scout, scout, scout!

Whoomp! There it is! What to do about Tar Spot of Corn in 2024

/in , , , /by

Damon Smith, Extension Field Crops Pathologist, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Over the last several weeks we have seen confirmed positives for tar spot in parts of Iowa, Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and now Wisconsin (Pepin Co.; Fig. 1). While it has been found in Wisconsin, the severity and incidence are extremely low and does not necessitate spraying fungicide at the moment! So, what should we do now?

My advice is to get prepared and make sure you have the tools in place to deal with this problem. As I said the last few seasons, tar spot is here to stay and we need to simply be prepared and ready to fight the disease. The first line of defense is to know if you have had tar spot before. This will tell you if there is resident inoculum sources present that can initiate epidemics. If you have seen tar spot on your farm before, then assume the pathogen is present and in close proximity to corn (the host). Remember the disease triangle? The last component of the triangle is the weather. If there has been conducive weather then the triangle has been met and risk is high for finding tar spot. So how do you know if the weather is conducive? Well, there is an app for that!

Tarspotter and Field Prophet are both Smartphone applications that can help you determine if the weather has been conducive to put your corn crop at high risk of tar spot development. The app DOES NOT tell you if the pathogen is present. We are working on this part of the triangle to improve our predictions, but you need to determine if the pathogen is present in your field. This tool just tells you if the weather has been conducive.

So what weather is conducive for tar spot development? Yes, precipitation is helpful, but more importantly, we need intermittent wet/dry cycles to give us intermittent leaf wetness. Specifically leaf wetness at night. What gives leaf wetness this time of year other than rain? That would be high dew points and humidity. These variables are included in the models that run in Tarspotter and Field Prophet. We also include temperature which is an influential variable too. These variables are measured over the last 14 days and 30 days and included in each daily run of the tool. We use the GPS on the smartphone to pull down cloud-based weather for a precise location. Thus, these results are site-specific. I also like to the use the Field Prophet version of the models as this version provides a 7-day trend line on how weather has been progressing and also allows for a true 7-day forecast. These additional tools can better help with the decision-making process. If you would like to learn more about the “nuts and bolts” that run behind the smartphone apps, you can find our research publication HERE.

My corn is at V8-V10, should I spray Fungicide?

Figure 2. Tar spot severity diagram indicating various levels of tar spot on corn leaves. Yield loss isn’t typically detectable in the field until severity reaches 10% or more on the ear leaf or leaves above this leaf.

My short answer is no! The disease is just getting started. If you find it in Wisconsin right now, it will be at low severity and is low in the canopy on leaves that are not going to contribute to yield. My advice is to use your prior knowledge of where tar spot occurred and the Tarspotter tool to help guide your scouting efforts. Get out into the fields and know what you are dealing with. Figure 2 shows various severity levels on a corn leaf. We don’t start to see yield loss until we reach about 10% severity on the ear leaves or above. Thus, you have time! Target fields planted to known susceptible hybrids. Get yourself prepared and use those lower leaves to monitor severity and tar spot progress. Be ready to protect (put fungicide on) those leaves that contribute to yield (ear leaf and above), later on especially if the weather becomes increasingly conducive (think wet/dry cycles!) and/or your scouting indicates severity is increasing.

When should I spray fungicide? What should I use?

When making decisions on using a fungicide for tar spot management keep in mind that fungicide active ingredients are important. Products with multiple fungicide classes are preferred (QoI + DMI or QoI + DMI + SDHI). Products with multiple fungicide classes tend to provide better efficacy and delay the development of fungicide resistance. See the CPN Fungicide Efficacy Guide for specific products and their ratings for tar spot and other diseases.

Application timing is very important for tar spot management. It is best to use scouting and/or tar spot risk or profit tools like Tarspotter and Field Prophet to make informed decisions about when to apply fungicides for tar spot management. These apps use weather data to determine if the environmental conditions are favorable for tar spot to develop, and consequently optimize fungicide application timing.

In most years, a fungicide application will not be needed prior to the V10 growth stage. In most years, one well-timed (VT-R3 growth stages) fungicide will be sufficient to manage tar spot. Even in years where two applications appear to improve tar spot control, improved ROI is marginal over a single well-timed application.

The Conclusion

DON’T PANIC! This is just a call to be ready. Download the apps and know what the weather is doing. Use your prior knowledge and scouting in key locations to track tar spot. Get your management plan in place. Have your fungicide of choice available. Communicate with your custom applicator. Be ready to spray between the VT and R3 growth stages if you plan to use just one fungicide application and you are seeing tar spot increase. If you spray between the V8 and VT growth stages, be ready to monitor the smartphone apps and do more scouting as you might have to pull the trigger again later in the season. Get out and SCOUT, SCOUT, SCOUT!

Other Resources

2023 Wisconsin Fungicide Test and Disease Management Summary Now Available!

/in , , , , , , /by

Brian Mueller, Researcher II, UW-Madison, Plant Pathology

Damon Smith, Professor and Extension Specialist, UW-Madison, Plant Pathology

Each year the Wisconsin Field Crops Pathology Program conducts a wide array of fungicide and disease management tests on alfalfa, corn, soybeans, and wheat. These tests help inform researchers, practitioners, and farmers about the efficacy of certain fungicide products on specific diseases and how to pair them with other disease management strategies. We hope you find this report useful in making decisions for the 2024 field season.

The 2023 Wisconsin Field Crops Fungicide Test and Disease Management Summary is available by clicking here. These tests are by no means an exhaustive evaluation of all products available, but can be used to understand the general performance of a particular fungicide in a particular environment. Keep in mind that the best data to make an informed decision, come from multiple years and environments. To find fungicide performance data from Wisconsin in other years, visit the Wisconsin Fungicide Test Summaries page. You can also consult publication A3646 – Pest Management in Wisconsin Field Crops to find information on products labeled for specific crops and efficacy ratings for particular products. Additional efficacy ratings for some fungicide products for corn foliar fungicides, soybean foliar and seed-applied fungicides, and wheat foliar fungicides can be found on the Crop Protection Network website.

Mention of specific products in these publications are for your convenience and do not represent an endorsement or criticism. Remember that this is by no means a complete test of all products available.  You are responsible for using pesticides according to the manufacturers current label. Some products listed in the reports referenced above may not actually have an approved Wisconsin pesticide label. Be sure to check with your local extension office or agricultural chemical supplier to be sure the product you would like to use has an approved label.  Follow all label instructions when using any pesticide. Remember the label is the law!

Wisconsin Field Crops Disease Update, August 9, 2023

/in , , , , /by

Damon Smith, Extension Field Crops Pathologist, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Figure 1. A Screen shot of a map developed in the Field Prophet app showing risk for tar spot development in Wisconsin as of August 9, 2023.

Well, it was going to happen sometime soon, tar spot has been confirmed in two counties in Wisconsin. You can track tar spot confirmations in realtime HERE. Both Lafayette and Rock counties were confirmed to have low levels of tar spot in several fields this week. The good news is that these finds are a month behind the initial confirmations in the state for the last two seasons. What does this mean? Well, it means that the tar spot impact on grain yield will likely not be has significant as it has been over the last couple of seasons. Exceptions to this statement will include late-planted corn where the current growth stages are around VT (tasseling) and susceptible silage hybrids. You should scout and track these situations carefully. Be prepared to chop silage early if tar spot really starts to move. You will want to watch moisture carefully in these situations.

The current risk for tar spot development remains moderate to high across much of the state (Fig. 1). Cooler weather and dewy evenings and mornings are keeping the risk elevated. Fungicide applications for much of the corn in the state should have happened already. Remember the optimal time to apply fungicides to control tar spot (and most other foliar corn diseases) is between the VT (tasseling) and R3 (milk) growth stages. Spraying fungicide after R3 has not yielded much of a return on investment. If you find tar spot, please don’t hesitate to send a high-quality photo to damon.smith@wisc.edu. We don’t disclose exact locations, but do like to track the county-level tar spot information. If you would like to learn more about tar spot and managing it, see my previous post HERE.

Figure 2. Sporecaster predictions for selected non-irrigated locations in Wisconsin for August 9, 2023.

In other news, white mold risk ranges from low in the southern portion of the state to moderate and high in the mid and upper portions of the state, respectively (Fig. 2). Most soybeans are probably headed toward the R4 or R5 growth stage. This means fungicide applications will no longer yield positive returns on investment. If soybeans were planted late and they are still in the R1 to R3 growth stages and you are in a moderate to high risk area, a fungicide should be applied at this time. If you would like to learn more about white mold management, see my previous post HERE. We have observed active white mold on susceptible varieties under irrigation already this season. I am anticipating pockets of white mold in the state, especially in our typical areas of concern in the central and northeastern quadrants.

As always, make sure you are out and scouting to be prepared for what is coming ahead!

Wisconsin Field Crops Disease Update, July 27, 2023

/in , , , , , , , /by

Damon Smith, Extension Field Crops Pathologist, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Shawn Conley, Extension Soybean and Small Grains Agronomist, Department of Plant and Agroecosystem Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Rains continue to fall around Wisconsin. While we still have a moderate drought in much of the state, some of that drought is being alleviated. However, with these timely rains, come disease concerns. Here are our thoughts on what is happening.

Phytophthora Root and Stem Rot of Soybean

Figure 1. Stem rot symptoms of Phythophthora rot and stem rot on soybeans.

It has been a couple of years since we have seen a significant epidemic of Phytophthora root and stem rot (PRSR) of soybean. However, since it has started raining, we have got a good look at how susceptible many of our soybean varieties are here in Wisconsin. PRSR is primarily cause by the fungal-like organism, Phytophthora sojae. PRSR is usually worse in fields that are no-till and/or are slow to drain. The PRSR pathogen likes to survive in old soybean residue and can also persist as a long-term survival structure in the soil itself. The organisms that causes PRSR becomes active if the soil temperatures are over 60 F and the soil becomes saturated. We had those conditions occur back in early to mid-July. Once the soil dried out a bit and a bit of environmental stress kicked in, we can readily observe the damage the organism caused in early July. Primarily what we are seeing right now is the stem rot phase (Fig. 1), with the symptoms including wilting of the plant and a distinct purple-brown lesion extending from the soil surface upward. If plants are pulled from the ground, you will also see poor root systems which is where the organisms typically first infects and causes damage.

At this point in the season, there is nothing that can be done.  DO NOT spray foliar fungicides for this problem. This will not be effective. You will want to check on the variety with the symptoms and consult the tech sheet to see what type of “Phytophthora gene” may have been included in the variety. These genes are called Rps genes and provide race-level resistance. The population of the PRSR pathogen can be a single race or mixed races in the field. The last time a survey of Phytophthora races was done in Wisconsin, it was noted that the Rps 1-k resistance gene should be effective on about 99% of the acres in the state. However, that survey was done over 15 years ago. Due to heavy use of the Rps 1-k resistance gene, we believe that the population in the state has shifted. We are seeing that resistance readily overcome. Unfortunately, most of the varieties currently grown in the state have this resistance. A recent check of the soybean variety trials 2022 show that out of 265 varieties tested 25% had no PRSR resistance gene, 2% had Rps 1-a, 29% Rps 1-c, 26% Rps 1-k, 9% Rps 3-a, and 9% had multi-genes. We are actively working with the Wisconsin Soybean Marketing Board to understand what the current population looks like. However, it is too early to tell what the races are primarily in our fields. Moving forward. perhaps choosing Rps 3-a or mixed gene varieties could help, but that is a shot in the dark for now.

Other things you can do for PRSR are to open up the rotation between soybean crops, and improve drainage in fields that are typically saturated for long periods of time. Like I said above, adjusting variety choice can help too. Seed treatment fungicides can also be used. However remember that the seed treatment is only going to be effective for the first 30 days or so after planting. After that we have to rely on varietal resistance to manage this problem. If you would like to find efficacy data on the seed treatments you can find that HERE.

We are looking for samples of PRSR from around Wisconsin. So feel free to reach out (damon.smith@wisc.edu) and we can coordinate getting samples sent to us. This will help with our survey efforts and eventual varietal recommendations.

Tar Spot Update

Figure 2. A Screen shot of a map developed in the Field Prophet app showing risk for tar spot development in Wisconsin as of July 27, 2023.

You can find the most recent updates on tar spot confirmations across the U.S. here: https://corn.ipmpipe.org/tarspot/.  Tarspotter is also showing mostly moderate to high risk across the state of Wisconsin (Fig. 2). This means you should be actively scouting for tar spot at this time. The risk is likely that you will find it across much of the state. If the corn growth stage is between VT/R1 and R3, then you might go ahead and consider a fungicide application. Our research has shown that one well-timed application of fungicide somewhere between VT/R1 – R3 will control tar spot enough for a yield response even in a heavy-pressure year. You can learn more about managing tar spot by clicking here. If you think you found tar spot I would appreciate if you would let us know. We can enter the county level data into the Corn IPMPipe Map and contribute to the cause.

White Mold Update

Figure 3. Sporecaster predictions for selected non-irrigated locations in Wisconsin for July 27, 2023.

The risk for white mold according to Sporecaster is a bit more spotty, compared to tar spot. Mostly the northern tier of the state is at high risk while central and southern Wisconsin varies from moderate to low (Fig. 3). If you are in a low-risk area and you are at R3 or beyond, you might not have much to worry about for this year when it comes to white mold. However, if you are in a moderate-risk zone, watch this situation carefully. If you are at R3 and the crop has good canopy, you might consider one late R3 application. If you are in a high-risk zone, the crop has canopied, and your soybean crop is in the bloom period, it is time to think about a fungicide application. The recent rains have made the risk in these areas generally stay high or increase. These will be the areas I would expect to find white mold 1-3 weeks from now. If you would like to learn more about white mold management, check out my previous article HERE.

As always, get out and look the crop. Scout, scout, scout!

Wisconsin Field Crops Disease Update, July 12, 2023

/in , , , /by

Damon Smith, Extension Field Crops Pathologist, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Here is southern Wisconsin we are finally getting some rains. These rains are appreciated and timely for the crops out there, but also timely for some important pathogens of wheat, corn, and soybeans. Let’s talk about where we are at with disease risk this week.

What’s up with Wheat?

Let’s talk first about wheat first. Folks have started harvesting the crop and bailing straw and I have been getting photos of sooty mold on heads. You can find out more about sooty molds on wheat by clicking here. Essentially sooty mold is caused by a number of opportunistic fungi that can come in and cause mostly aesthetic problems on wheat heads that might have matured early, died early, or had other stress. These fungi do not need to be controlled. However, you should harvest affected wheat as soon as possible. Occasionally if wheat with sooty mold is left in the field for a long time, these fungi can eventually find their way in to the kernel and cause a problem called black point which can lead to quality problems. Get out and get that crop in as fast as you can!

Should I be Spraying for Tar Spot?

Figure 1. A Screen shot of a map developed in the Field Prophet app showing risk for tar spot development in Wisconsin as of July 12, 2023.

The short answer is not yet! Be patient. Yes, there have been many recent confirmations of the disease across the Midwest. You can find the most recent updates on tar spot confirmations here: https://corn.ipmpipe.org/tarspot/.  Tarspotter is also showing mostly high risk across the state (Fig. 1). This means you should get out and scout! Remember, the best time to spray fungicide for tar spot is between the VT and R3 growth stages. We are not quite there yet and need to be patient to maximize the performance of our fungicides. You can learn more about managing tar spot by clicking here. If you think you found tar spot I would appreciate if you would let us know. We can enter the county level data into the Corn IPMPipe Map and contribute to the cause.  Again, be patient and get out there and scout and get your steps in!

What to Do About Soybean White Mold?

Figure 2. Sporecaster predictions for selected non-irrigated locations in Wisconsin for July 12, 2023.

Yeah, it’s bean dry, yeah soybeans are slow to canopy. If you didn’t plant soybeans in narrow rows, you need to be patient and let soybeans get to full canopy. If this happens before the R3 growth stage, then check Sporecaster and see what the risk is. As of today, risk is low to moderate in south and south-central Wisconsin, Southwest Wisconsin, while in east and northeast Wisconsin risk is high if soybeans are flowering and canopy is nearly closed (Fig. 2). Again, I know it has been dry, but we are getting some timely rains that are impacting risk and resulting in the increase in risk. I do think that we can be patient and wait to the R3 growth stage to make the fungicide application decision. Our data suggest that this is the best time to spray for white mold in Wisconsin in recent years. If you would like to learn more about white mold management, check out my previous article HERE.

What Should I do About Tar Spot of Corn in 2023?

/in , , , /by

Damon Smith, Extension Field Crops Pathologist, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Brian Mueller, Researcher II, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Roger Schmidt, Nutrient and Pest Management Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison

It didn’t take long this year to find tar spot in the Midwest. Over the last several weeks we have seen confirmed positives for tar spot in parts of Iowa, Missouri, Kansas, and Nebraska (Fig. 1). This is earlier than last year despite. With that said, the severity is extremely low and does not necessitate spraying fungicide at the moment! So what should you do?

Figure 1. Map of U.S. counties where tar spot has been confirmed in the 2023 season, as of July 5, 2023. Map source: https://corn.ipmpipe.org/tarspot/.

What should I do?

My advice is to get prepared and make sure you have the tools in place to deal with this problem. As I said the last few seasons, tar spot is here to stay and we need to simply be prepared and ready to fight the disease. The first line of defense is to know if you have had tar spot before. This will tell you if there is resident inoculum sources present that can initiate epidemics. If you have seen tar spot on your farm before, then assume the pathogen is present and in close proximity to corn (the host). Remember the disease triangle? The last component of the triangle is the weather. If there has been conducive weather then the triangle has been met and risk is high for finding tar spots. So how do you know if the weather is conducive? Well, there is an app for that!

Tarspotter and Field Prophet are both Smartphone applications that can help you determine if the weather has been conducive to put your corn crop at high risk of tar spot development. Figure 2 shows a map of Wisconsin from the Field Prophet version of the tool that is showing that weather has been highly conducive for the development of tar spots. The app DOES NOT tell you if the pathogen is present. We are working on this part of the triangle to improve our predictions, but you need to determine if the pathogen is present in your field. This tool just tells you if the weather has been conducive.

Figure 2. A Screen shot of a map developed in the Field Prophet app showing risk for tar spot development in Wisconsin as of July 5, 2023.

So what weather is conducive for tar spot development? You are probably asking yourself this as we are in an epic drought, yet the forecasted risk of tar spot is high across the state. Well conducive weather for the pathogen it is different that the weather needed to grow corn. Yes, precipitation is helpful, but more importantly, we need intermittent wet/dry cycles to give us intermittent leaf wetness. Specifically leaf wetness at night. What gives leaf wetness this time of year other than rain? That would be high dew points and humidity. These variables are included in the models that run in Tarspotter and Field Prophet. We also include temperature which is an influential variable too. These variables are measured over the last 14 days and 30 days and included in each daily run of the tool. We use the GPS on the smartphone to pull down cloud-based weather for a precise location. Thus, these results are site-specific. I also like to the use the Field Prophet version of the models as this version provides a 7-day trend line on how weather has been progressing and also allows for a true 7-day forecast. These additional tools can better help with the decision-making process. If you would like to learn more about the “nuts and bolts” that run behind the smartphone apps, you can find our research publication HERE.

My corn is at V10, should I spray Fungicide?

My short answer is no! The disease is just getting started. If you find it in Wisconsin right now, it will be at low severity and is low in the canopy on leaves that are not going to contribute to yield. My advice is to use your prior knowledge of where tar spot occurred and the Tarspotter tool to help guide your scouting efforts. Get out into the fields and know what you are dealing with. Figure 3 shows various severity levels on a corn leaf. We don’t start to see yield loss until we reach about 10% severity on the ear leaves or above. Thus, you have time! Target fields planted to known susceptible hybrids. Get yourself prepared and use those lower leaves to monitor severity and tar spot progress. Be ready to protect (put fungicide on) those leaves that contribute to yield (ear leaf and above), later on especially if the weather becomes increasingly conducive (think wet/dry cycles!) and/or your scouting indicates severity is increasing.

When should I spray fungicide? What should I use?

Figure 3. Tar spot severity diagram indicating various levels of tar spot on corn leaves. Yield loss isn’t typically detectable in the field until severity reaches 10% or more on the ear leaf or leaves above this leaf.

Our recent work has shown that if you get the product right, you can generally control tar spot to the point to preserve your yield potential, with one well timed spray. So what is that timing of the single application? That would be between the VT (tasseling) and R3 (milk) growth stages. We determined this using a series of trials where we did single applications of fungicide for individual growth stages. Figure 4 shows the results of two trials from 2020 where the window of opportunity to reduce the severity of tar spot with a single application is between VT and R3. Yes, the two-spray program (V8+VT) did also control tar spot, but all the work was done by the VT application, not the V8-timed spray! Thus, if you chose to spray your 2023 crop at this point in the season, you stand a good chance of having to come back with a second application later in the season.

Also notice in figure 4 that Tarspotter was tested in 2020 and did not perform very well. This was an early iteration of the tool and we have since improved its performance. So please don’t judge the tool based on this figure. If you would like to see how Tarspotter performed in advising fungicide applications last season, check out this article based on the 2021 field season.

Now the questions is what fungicide should you choose? The short answer is that you have lots of options. You can learn more about fungicides and fungicide performance by CLICKING HERE. You can also check out the efficacy of various fungicides based on a collective of University research by viewing the “Fungicide Efficacy for Control of Corn Diseases” on the Crop Protection Network website. In addition, Dr. Darcy Telenko at Purdue University led an effort to publish data from a multi-state coordinated fungicide trial where we tested various fungicides during the 2021 epidemic.

Figure 4. Tar spot intensity after spraying fungicide once at each corn growth stage during the 2020 field season.

 

Figures 5 shows the tar spot severity, while figure 6 the corn yield, from those trials where a single application of each of the products was made at the VT growth stage. Clearly you have lots of options when it comes to products that can control tar spot. That is good news! Yes, some products do a bit better in preserving yield over others, but all fungicides tested in 2021 resulted in numerically higher yields than not-treating. Remember that 2021 was a banner year for tar spot. These results might not be as clear in a year where tar spot is not as intense.

Figure 5. Tar spot severity from multi-state trials where corn was treated with foliar fungicides at the VT corn growth stage, or not treated. Source: Telenko et al., 2022 – https://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/10.1094/PHP-02-22-0012-BR.

Figure 6. Corn yield from multi-state trials where corn was treated with foliar fungicides at the VT corn growth stage, or not treated. Source: Telenko et al., 2022 – https://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/10.1094/PHP-02-22-0012-BR.

The Conclusion

DON’T PANIC! This is just a call to be ready. Download the apps and know what the weather is doing. Use your prior knowledge and scouting in key locations to track tar spot. Get your management plan in place. Have your fungicide of choice available. Communicate with your custom applicator. Be ready to spray between the VT and R3 growth stages if you plan to use just one fungicide application and you are seeing tar spot increase. If you spray between the V8 and VT growth stages, be ready to monitor the smartphone apps and do more scouting as you might have to pull the trigger again later in the season. Get out and SCOUT, SCOUT, SCOUT!

Other Resources